Disclosures based on the TCFD recommendations

The Chugai Group expressed its support for the TCFD recommendations in January 2020*1. Chugai has stated in the “TOP I 2030” (FY2021-FY2030) growth strategy that it will “conduct global environment measures” in the “Foundation for Growth” that is one of the five reforms to realize the top innovator image and is strengthening initiatives to address materiality (material issues) identified based on the impact they have on the Chugai Group’s mission, the economy, society and the environment.

TCFD

TCFD logo

TCFD*2 was established as a task force on climate-related financial disclosures by the Financial Stability Board in response to requests from leaders of G20 countries in 2015. Chugai is working to strengthen its platform for sustained growth by strengthening governance on measures to address climate change, implementing scenario analysis based on analysis or risks and opportunities and their financial impact, and responding to climate change risks and opportunities, and engaging in further enhancement of disclosure.

Chugai’s Climate Change Responses

The Chugai Group recognizes that climate change is an urgent global issue, and has set the “Sustainability and the Environment” as one of the key areas under the “Growth Platform Transformation” pillar of our newly formulated growth strategy, TOP I 2030. We will contribute to the realization of a sustainable global environment by setting our Mid-Term Environmental Goals 2030 based on the three issues identified as material: climate change and energy countermeasures, promotion of resource circulation and appropriate water management, and protection of biodiversity. In particular, since climate change countermeasures are the most important theme worldwide, we will actively contribute to solving social issues by setting and implementing a long-term goal of zero Scope 1 and 2 energy-related emissions by 2050.

Click here for more information on the Mid-Term Environmental Goals 2030.

In addition, the Chugai Group regularly classifies and verifies the material issues based on the business environment and external expectations, demands, and strategic progress, and at the same time, conducts ongoing scenario analyses to address climate change-related risks and opportunities with a vision toward 2050, while also enhancing information disclosure.

In 2024, building on the results of the scenario analysis for physical risks conducted in 2021, the analysis was conducted again with new information included, and qualitative and quantitative assessments of transition risks were also added. We will consider countermeasures to address the issues that we have once again recognized, and accordingly, review our targets and indicators in the future.

The Chugai Group will disclose financial information related to climate change in line with the framework of “Governance,” “Strategy,” “Risk Management,” and “Indicators and Targets” advocated in the TCFD recommendations.

The analysis has been conducted with the latest information available as of April 2024.

Governance The organization’s governance around climate-related risks and opportunities 1. The board’s oversight for climate-related risks and opportunities
2. Management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Risk Management How the organization identifies, assesses, and manages climate-related risks 3. The organization’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks
4. The processes for managing climate-related risks
5. How the processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organization’s overall risk management
Strategy The actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning where such information is material 6. The climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified over the short, medium, and long term
7. The impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategies, and financial planning
8. The resilience of the organization’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2℃ or lower scenario
Metrics and Targets The metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material 9. The metrics used by the organization to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process
10. Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the related risks
11. The targets used by the organization to manage climate-related risks and opportunities, and performance against targets

Governance

The board’s oversight for Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities

The Chugai Group is placing sustainability at the center of its business activities and is implementing the following system for protecting the global environment, including Climate-related issues.

The Board of Directors conducts deliberation of policy in regard to sustainability and monitoring of progress and, it is responsible for the decision-making function regarding the most important management issues, including risks and opportunities of global environmental preservation related to nature issues, and supervises business execution by receiving regular quarterly reports on business execution status and reports on important decisions made at the Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee conduct deliberation of sustainability related plans and individual policies and, it makes important decisions regarding company-wide management strategies and business execution including risks and opportunities of global environmental preservation related to nature issues.

The Sustainability Committee and the Risk Management Committee work under the Executive Committee to formulate strategies for more specific and specialized matters and oversee their promotion. The Sustainability Committee (four times a year) formulates and executes policies and strategies related to sustainability. It also submits proposals to the Executive Committee and reports to the Board of Directors. The Risk Management Committee oversees risk management, and promotes activities to identify and measure major risks. It is also responsible for deliberations at the Executive Committee and reports to the Board of Directors.

*Please refer to the following website for further details on the Sustainability Promotion System.
Sustainability Promotion System

Risk Management

The organization’s Processes for Identifying and Assessing Climate-Related Risks

The Chugai Group has created global and domestic risk maps that include climate change risks and uses them as a tool to quantitatively manage risks. The Risk Management Committee, which is one of the advisory committees of the Executive Committee, identifies the risks that have a particularly significant impact on management, among the risks identified in the risk map, as company-wide risks, and selects the corresponding departments to deal with these risks. An inherent risk score is calculated for each identified risk, based on the degree of impact (financial impact) and the probability of occurrence (frequency of occurrence). Each means to mitigate or avoid the inherent risk, such as measures that have already been taken against the inherent risk, the existence of systems for taking measures, the views of experts, etc., will be given a score, which is subtracted from the inherent risk score. The priority will then be determined according to the residual risk score. High residual risk that has a score of 3.67 or higher is judged to have a significant strategic impact, and countermeasures against which are considered with priority. The residual risk is classified into three levels: High (3.67 to 5.00), Medium (2.34 to 3.66), and Low (1.00 to 2.33), and is addressed in the order of High, Medium, and Low.

The Processes for Managing Climate-Related Risks

The Chugai Group has introduced Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework that visualizes all risk relating to business activities and manages it integrally to maximize corporate value. We have formulated the Risk Appetite Statement to clarify policy on risk preferences with the aim of creating a healthy risk culture.

We categorize risks to be addressed on a Company-wide basis into strategic risk and operational risk, identify, and visualize these risks in a centralized manner, and engage in Company-wide discussions to promote efficient risk management. “Strategic risk” refers to risks inherent in strategic decision-making and risks that could impede execution of strategies. Operational risk refers to risks that impede the smooth operation of business activities. We are working every day to appropriately manage these risks. We recognize and manage Climate-related risks as important risks in our company-wide risk management, and position them as operational risks [(6) Global Environmental Issues].

Please refer to the following website for further details on the Chugai Group’s business risks.
Business Risks

Chugai has established the Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Regulations and set up a Risk Management Committee as a corporate management committee, as well as Division Risk Management Committees in each division and at subsidiaries in Japan and overseas.

The Risk Management Committee monitors risk management in each division with a Company-wide perspective, evaluates reports from the Division Risk Management Committees, and submits reports to the Executive Committee as necessary. It also identifies Group-wide risk issues as “Chugai Group Risk & Compliance Challenges” that may have a material impact on management, taking into consideration the status of response by the relevant divisions and trends in the industry and external environment, and submits progress reports on Company-wide measures to the Executive Committee.

Division Risk Compliance Management Committees create and quantitatively evaluate risk maps that identify the risks in the business activities of their respective divisions. If Climate-related risks are judged to be the risks to be prioritized, to address priority risks, which are division risk issues, the Division Risk Management Committees draw up annual response plans and submit reports as needed on the progress of the plans to the Risk Management Committee. The Chugai Group considers protection of the global environment to be an important foundation supporting all of its business activities. The progress of countermeasures against Climate-related risks is periodically reported from the departments in charge to the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors once a year, in addition, important matters are reported as needed.

The image of our ERM operation. It shows that we conduct risk management activities based on the Risk Appetite Statement, divide risks to be addressed on a company-wide basis into strategic risk and operational risk, and identify, classify, and visualize these risks in a centralized fashion for company-wide sharing and discussion.

Definition of the Degree of Financial Impact

The definition of financial impact for the purpose of calculating the inherent risk score for the identified risks is as follows.

Low: Less than ¥100 million
Medium: ¥100 million or more, but less than ¥5 billion
High: ¥5 billion or more

Strategy

Assumptions for Scenario Analysis

The Chugai Group conducted a company-wide scenario analysis to determine what business issues could emerge in the highly uncertain future as a result of the transition to a decarbonized society, under two scenarios: a scenario in which decarbonization efforts are in progress (1.5℃) and a scenario in which society proceeds as is without any mitigation measures (4℃).

The analysis targets the Chugai Group and takes into account the entire supply chain, including raw material procurement. We also identify, analyze, and assess climate-related risks and opportunities over short-term (1-3 years), medium-term (3-5 years), and long-term (5-10+ years) horizons.

Transition Scenario Content Temperature
IEA NZE 2050 A pathway to limit temperature rise to less than 1.5℃ as outlined in the IEA World Energy Outlook 2022.
A scenario in which developed countries achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 as clean energy policies and investments surge.
1.5℃
Physical Scenario Content Temperature
SSP1-2.6
(RCP 2.6)
A scenario from the IPCC 6th Assessment Report that limits temperature rise to below 2℃ by the end of the 21st century.
A projection of net zero CO2 emissions in the second half of the 21st century.
0.3 – 1.7℃
SSP5-8.5
(RCP 8.5)
A scenario from the IPCC 6th Assessment Report showing highest emissions with reliance on fossil fuel and no introduction of climate policy. 2.6 – 4.8℃

Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities

For physical risks, our main products were analyzed in this study.

[Legends] ▼/▲: Low; ▼▼/▲▲: ¥100 million or more, but less than ¥5 billion; ▼▼▼/▲▲▲: ¥5 billion or more

    Content Manifestation
period
Impact Measures to address risks and opportunities
1.5℃ 4℃
Risk classification Transition New regulations (1) Increase in remediation costs due to enactment or strengthening of new regulations such as carbon taxes and emissions trading schemes Medium term ▼▼  
  • Moving to fossil-free electricity, including conversion of commercial vehicles to EVs
  • 100% sustainable electricity ratio by 2025
  • Collaborate with external partners to promote energy conservation using the latest technologies, such as methanation technology
Market changes (2) Increase in remediation costs due to changes in product packaging materials resulting from stricter regulations on plastic packaging materials Short term ▼▼  
  • Change all products to environmentally friendly packaging materials by 2030
  • Joint development of environmentally friendly plastics
(3) Rising energy costs due to the spread of renewable energy Medium term ▼▼  
  • Collaborate with external partners to promote energy conservation using the latest technologies, such as heat pumps
Physical Acute (4) Sales decrease due to suspension of operations at the company’s production sites following an increase in natural disasters such as heavy rainfall and large typhoons Short to long term   ▼▼▼
  • Establish a system for continuous supply of products and services, including a second site and safety stock
  • Implement measures to deal with the maximum physical impact assumed from the latest hazard maps, etc. (e.g., emergency power generation measures based on the assumption of a 5-m inundation)
(5) Sales decrease due to disruption in supplier procurement following an increase in heavy rainfall, typhoons, or floods Short to long term ▼▼▼ ▼▼▼
Chronic (6) Sales decrease due to insufficient procurement of raw materials (derived from marine organisms) as a result of changes in the growing environment of natural raw materials Medium term  
  • Consider developing products that do not use natural raw materials in the future
Opportunity classification Resource efficiency (7) Promotion of energy conservation through water resource reduction and industrial waste reduction Short to long term  
  • Promote business activities based on circular economy (promote the recycling of waste plastics, distillation and reuse of waste solvents, and reuse of research equipment)
Products and services (8) Increased demand for new drugs to combat the spread of infectious diseases caused by dengue fever and permafrost thawing Short to long term ▲▲~
▲▲▲
▲▲~
▲▲▲
  • Ongoing new drug development
  • Expand the coverage of existing drugs

Business Impact Assessment Based on Scenario Analysis

We conducted a business impact assessment of the risks and opportunities for the following items that were classified as High under the definition of the degree of financial impact: (4) Sales decrease due to suspension of operations at the company’s production sites following an increase in natural disasters such as heavy rainfall and large typhoons; (5) Sales decrease due to disruption in supplier procurement following an increase in heavy rainfall, typhoons, or floods; (8) Increased demand for new drugs to combat the spread of infectious diseases caused by dengue fever and permafrost thawing.

(4) Flood Damage Survey Results for Our Laboratories and Production Sites

We studied the magnitude of flood risk using the “multi-layered hazard map” which is offered by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. The results showed that the risk of flooding was small at all sites except for the Ukima Site. Even at sites where damage from flooding is expected, we have not included these sites in our impact estimation because we have determined that there is no risk considering that the damage can be minimized within the scope of the measures currently in place. At the Chugai Life Science Park Yokohama which is our research laboratory located in Yokohama city, although the estimated inundation height was 0.5-3 m in the 1.5℃ scenario and 3-5 m in the 4℃ scenario, the duration of inundation was not estimated and the risk is considered small.

The Ukima Site, which is the production site for our main products B and D, is located near the Arakawa River, a Class A river, and we have put in place countermeasures for critical facilities based on the assumption of an inundation height of 5 m. However, due to the rapid increase in climate change risks in recent years, we determined that a reevaluation of risks was necessary, so we conducted another risk analysis and evaluated the financial impact based on the results of that analysis. The value of sales decrease due to flood damage was examined, and it was found that, under the 1.5℃ scenario, the current number of days in inventory for each product and the response based on the business continuity plan (BCP) would be sufficient to cope with the situation. However, under the assumption of a megaflood that occurs once in 1,000 years under the 4℃ scenario, the estimated inundation height due to flooding was 3.34 m in the 1.5℃ scenario and 6.68 m in the 4℃ scenario. In such a case, the duration of inundation is estimated to be two to four weeks. The calculation logic in this quantitative evaluation is explained below. We will simulate the detailed impact in the future and consider improvement measures to minimize it.

Calculation Logic

Using the “multi-layered hazard map”, the estimated number of days of damage that cannot be covered by the number of days in inventory was calculated for each product. This number was then multiplied by sales per day to estimate the value of sales decrease for evaluation.

Calculation Items
(i) Estimated inundation height (projected scale/assumed maximum scale)
<Multi-layered hazard map>
(ii) Duration of inundation
<Multi-layered hazard map>
(iii) Number of days it takes to recover from a disaster
(iv) Product lead time
(v) Number of days in inventory

(5) Damage to suppliers and outsourced manufacturers due to floods

Our products are procured, manufactured, and shipped not only from our own factories, but also from suppliers and outsourced manufacturers located in various countries and territories.

With respect to domestic and overseas suppliers and outsourced manufacturers of our main products, we verified the overall water risk using the Water Risk Filter (WRF) for overseas sources and the “WRF” and “multi-layered hazard map” for domestic sources. For Products A and D, the estimated inundation heights are 3.34 m in the 1.5℃ scenario and 6.68 m in the 4℃ scenario; for Product B, the estimated inundation heights are 5 m in the 1.5℃ scenario and 10 m in the 4℃ scenario; for Product C, the estimated inundation heights are 3 m in the 1.5℃ scenario and 5 m in the 4℃ scenario. The flood risk for the domestic supplier of Product B was identified to be the highest, with the possibility of an estimated inundation height of up to 10.0 m and an inundation duration of up to two weeks in the case of a once-in-1000-year flood event. The calculation logic in this quantitative evaluation is explained below. We will simulate the detailed impact in the future and consider improvement measures to minimize it.

Product Country Item Estimated inundation height due to flood
(2030 / 2050)
1.5℃ 4℃
Product A*1 Singapore Biopharmaceutical drug substance 3.34 m 6.68 m
Product B*2 Tochigi, Japan Rubber stopper 5 m 10 m
Product C*2 Gifu, Japan Synthetic drug substance 3 m 5 m
Product D*1 China Biopharmaceutical drug substance 3.34 m 6.68 m
  1. *1 Source: Multi-layered hazard map (https://disaportal.gsi.go.jp/)
  2. *2 Source: Water Risk Filter (https://riskfilter.org/)
  3. *3 Products A and D are from overseas suppliers and are only evaluated using the WRF. Since the calculation items (i) and (ii) required for the estimation are exclusive to the “multi-layered hazard map” and information is not available for the WRF, data from the Ukima Site, which is a representative domestic manufacturing site, has been used instead.
  4. *4 When using the “multi-layered hazard map”, the “1.5℃ scenario” is defined as the occurrence of damage on the projected scale (once-in-100-year level), whereas the “4℃ scenario” is defined as the occurrence of damage on the assumed maximum scale (once-in-1000-year level).

Parameters Used for Quantitative Evaluation

Calculation Logic

  1. Using the WRF and “multi-layered hazard map,” suppliers/outsourced manufacturers with high flood risk were identified for each product.
  2. The estimated number of days of damage that cannot be covered by the number of days in inventory was calculated for each product.
  3. This number was then multiplied by sales per day to estimate the value of sales decrease for evaluation.
Calculation Items
(i) Estimated inundation height (projected scale/assumed maximum scale)
<Multi-layered hazard map>
(ii) Duration of inundation
<Multi-layered hazard map>
(iii) Number of days it takes to recover from a disaster
(iv) Product lead time
(v) Number of days in inventory

* Only suppliers and outsourced manufacturers that “handle or manufacture critical raw materials” were subject to calculation. (Because they are directly linked to the suspension of our product supplies in the event of a shutdown due to flood)

(8) Increased demand for new drugs to combat climate-related diseases

Global warming is increasing the risks of animal-borne infectious diseases, such as the Asian tiger mosquito, and of unknown viral infections due to permafrost thawing. We conducted a scenario analysis taking into consideration the growing demand for antiviral drugs developed by our Company for each of these infectious diseases. The results revealed that significant opportunities exist in the 4℃ scenario in all analyses.

A study of future changes in permafrost area shows that the rate of thawing as of 2050 is predicted to reach about 7% (compared to 2022). This suggests the possibility of an increased risk of viral infection due to the emergence of unknown viruses caused by permafrost thawing, and possibly, a subsequent increase in sales as a result. (See Center for Global Environmental Research News, December 2021 issue)

An analysis was also conducted for mosquito-borne infectious diseases, in terms of the size of population at risk of infection and the growth rate. The analysis based on the 4℃ scenario revealed that Asia accounts for 60% and Europe accounts for 10% of the global population at risk of mosquito-borne infection. Particularly in Europe, the growth rate of the population at risk of infection is predicted to increase significantly from 56.7% to 159.8%, from 2030 to 2050. As a result, it was expected that a lucrative market, including latent markets, could be secured as of 2050. (See data from “Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change”; growth rate is compared to 2019 data)

Metrics and Targets

Mid-term Environmental Goals 2030: Climate Change Countermeasures

As metrics used by an organization to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process, Chugai has set the following targets.

Additionally, see “Climate Change Countermeasures” for performance against the targets.

  Item KPI (base year 2019)
1 Scope 1+2 (*1) CO2 emissions 2025: 40% reduction
2030: 60-75% reduction
2050: Zero emissions
2 Scope 1+2 (*1) CO2 emissions 2025: 5% reduction (*2)
2030: 15% reduction (*2)
3 Sustainable electricity ratio 2025: 100%
4 Total fuel consumption of commercial vehicles 2025: 35% reduction
2030: 75% reduction
5 Fluorocarbons consumption 2025: 25% reduction
2030: 100% reduction (base year 2020)
6 Scope 3 CO2 emissions (*3) 2030: 30% reduction
  • (*1) Scope 1: Direct energy-related emissions; Scope 2: Indirect energy-related emissions
  • (*2) Per total floor area (excluding rental properties)
  • (*3) Scope 3: Indirect emissions other than Scope 1 and 2; target added in 2021

Future Direction

The results of this quantitative scenario analysis allowed us to understand the financial impacts of the risks and opportunities for our Company. We recognize that these are important management issues and should be viewed from a strategic perspective. As the next step, we will continue to add or revise our targets and indicators for 2050.

Global Environment